Cold Brew vs. Hot Brew: A Look at Chlorogenic Acid and Health

[1] — Ernesto Illy, Luciano Navarini — Neglected Food Bubbles: “The Espresso Coffee Foam. — 2011-Sep — https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21892345/" [2] — Gustavo Galarza, Jorge G Figueroa — Volatile Compound Characterization of Coffee ( — 2022-Mar-21 — https: “//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35335365/” [3] — Katarína Poláková, Alica Bobková, Alžbeta Demianová, Marek Bobko, Judita Lidiková, Lukáš Jurčaga, Ľubomír Belej, Andrea Mesárošová, Melina Korčok, Tomáš Tóth — Quality Attributes and Sensory Acceptance of Different Botanical Coffee Co-Products. — 2023-Jul-11 — https: “//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37509767/” [4] — Rongsuo Hu, Fei Xu, Xiao Chen, Qinrui Kuang, Xingyuan Xiao, Wenjiang Dong — The Growing Altitude Influences the Flavor Precursors, Sensory Characteristics and Cupping Quality of the Pu’er Coffee Bean. — 2024-Nov-28 — https: “//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39682914/” [5] — Marlene Machado, Iva Fernandes, Ana Fernandes, Liliana Espírito Santo, Cláudia Passos, Aroa Santamarina, Alejandra Cardelle-Cobas, Manuel A Coimbra, Maria B P P Oliveira, Helena Ferreira, Rita C Alves — Impact of In vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion on the Chemical Composition and Prebiotic Potential of Coffee Silverskin. — 2025-Sep-05 — https: “//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40911156/” [6] — Megan Fuller, Niny Z Rao — The Effect of Time, Roasting Temperature, and Grind Size on Caffeine and Chlorogenic Acid Concentrations in Cold Brew Coffee. — 2017-Dec-21 — https: “//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29269877/” [7] — Elza Bevilacqua, Vinicius Cruzat, Indu Singh, Roselyn B Rose’Meyer, Sunil K Panchal, Lindsay Brown — The Potential of Spent Coffee Grounds in Functional Food Development. — 2023-Feb-16 — https: “//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36839353/” [8] — Nur Hadiyani Zakaria, Kanyawee Whanmek, Sirinapa Thangsiri, Wimonphan Chathiran, Warangkana Srichamnong, Uthaiwan Suttisansanee, Chalat Santivarangkna — Optimization of Cold Brew Coffee Using Central Composite Design and Its Properties Compared with Hot Brew Coffee. — 2023-Jun-19 — https: “//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37372624/”

Question: How does cold brew coffee compare with hot brew in terms of chlorogenic acid retention and health effects?

Cold Brew vs. Hot Brew: A Look at Chlorogenic Acid and Health

The world of coffee offers a delightful spectrum of flavors and brewing methods, each promising a unique experience. Among these, cold brew and hot brew stand out as popular choices, yet they differ significantly in their preparation and, consequently, their chemical composition. For health-conscious coffee lovers, understanding these differences, particularly concerning chlorogenic acids, is key. Chlorogenic acids (CGAs) are a group of compounds found in coffee beans that are of interest for their potential health benefits, including antioxidant properties [4, 5, 6]. This article delves into how these compounds fare in cold brew compared to their hot brewed counterparts and what that might mean for our well-being.

The Science of Extraction: Temperature’s Role

The fundamental difference between cold brew and hot brew coffee lies in the extraction temperature. Hot brewing, as the name suggests, involves using hot water (often between 90-96°C) to extract soluble compounds from coffee grounds [5]. This method is efficient at dissolving a wide range of compounds. Cold brewing, on the other hand, uses cold water and a significantly longer steeping time, often 12-24 hours, to achieve extraction [6, 8]. This prolonged, low-temperature process influences the types and amounts of compounds that end up in your cup.

Research has specifically investigated the impact of these brewing methods on chlorogenic acid content. Studies indicate that cold brewing can lead to a higher retention of chlorogenic acids compared to hot brewing [6, 8]. One study found that the concentration of chlorogenic acids was affected by brewing time, roasting temperature, and grind size in cold brew coffee [6]. Another comparative study directly observed that cold brew coffee retained more chlorogenic acids than hot brew coffee [8]. While specific extraction parameters like fermentation time or pH were mentioned in the context of volatile compounds and coffee co-products [2, 3], the focus for CGA retention in cold vs. hot brew appears to be primarily driven by the temperature and duration of the brewing process itself.

Chlorogenic Acids and Potential Health Implications

Chlorogenic acids are thought to be responsible for some of coffee’s health-promoting effects. They are known for their antioxidant activity, which can help combat cellular damage caused by free radicals [5]. Furthermore, CGAs have been explored for their potential roles in metabolic health and other physiological processes [4, 5].

Given that cold brew coffee tends to preserve higher concentrations of chlorogenic acids [6, 8], it logically follows that cold brew might offer a greater dose of these beneficial compounds. While the exact health benefits are still an active area of research, the higher CGA content in cold brew could translate to a more potent antioxidant profile in the final beverage. It’s important to note that the overall health effects of coffee consumption are complex and influenced by many factors, including the type of coffee bean, roasting process, and individual consumption patterns [2, 4, 5, 7]. However, from a CGA perspective, cold brew appears to hold an advantage.

Factors Influencing CGA in Coffee

Beyond the brewing method, several other factors can influence the chlorogenic acid content in coffee. The origin and processing of coffee beans play a role. For instance, the altitude at which coffee beans are grown can affect their flavor precursors and sensory characteristics, which can indirectly relate to compound profiles like CGAs [4]. Roasting temperature and time are also critical; higher temperatures and longer roasting durations can degrade CGAs [6]. Grind size also plays a part, with finer grinds potentially leading to more efficient extraction but also potentially more degradation during hot brewing [6]. The study on cold brew specifically highlighted that time, roasting temperature, and grind size all impacted caffeine and chlorogenic acid concentrations [6]. While the provided references don’t detail the specific pH or fermentation times used in the cold brew vs. hot brew comparisons, the general understanding is that the lower temperature and longer steeping time of cold brew favor the extraction and retention of CGAs without the high heat that can break them down.

Conclusion: A Cooler Choice for CGAs

When comparing cold brew and hot brew coffee, cold brew emerges as a method that generally retains higher levels of chlorogenic acids. This is primarily attributed to the lower extraction temperature and extended steeping time, which favor the preservation of these potentially beneficial compounds. While other factors like bean origin, roasting, and grind size also influence CGA content, the brewing method itself appears to be a significant differentiator. For individuals seeking to maximize their intake of chlorogenic acids from their daily coffee, cold brew coffee presents a compelling option.